Showing posts with label dh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dh. Show all posts

Thursday, April 6, 2023

April 6, 1973: The Designated Hitter Debuts

April 6, 1973, 50 years ago: A new baseball season begins. In the American League, but not in the National League, a new phenomenon makes its regular-season debut: The designated hitter.

The idea of a player who would be in a game only to bat for the pitcher -- a position whose practitioners had traditionally spent so much time focusing on their craft that they allowed themselves to become terrible hitters -- was first brought up in 1906, by the manager of the Philadelphia Athletics, Connie Mack. His idea went nowhere. In 1929, it was John Heydler, with retroactive irony the President of the National League, who came close to convincing his team owners to try it during Spring Training.

The idea lay dormant until 1968, "The Year of the Pitcher." Batting statistics were so weak that year that attendance fell. Both major leagues figured that increased hitting meant increased attendance, so, for some Spring Training games in 1969, they experimented with what was then called a "designated pinch hitter," or DPH. It was an option, and most AL teams were willing to try it -- but most NL teams were not.

Four minor leagues, including the Class AAA International League, started using it in 1969. With its success, the AL tried it again during Spring Training in 1971. Again, the NL didn't. On January 11, 1973, the AL team owners voted 8-4 to approve it for 3 years, on a trial basis.

The season began on April 6, and, the way things worked out, by a few minutes, the 1st player to be a DH in a regular-season game was Ron Blomberg of the New York Yankees. They opened the season on the road, against their arch-rivals, the Boston Red Sox, at Fenway Park.

A 24-year-old Jewish native of Atlanta, wearing Number 12, and normally a 1st baseman, he came to bat against Luis Tiant in the top of the 1st inning, with the bases loaded and 2 out: Matty Alou had doubled, and Bobby Murcer and Graig Nettles had drawn walks. Blomberg also drew a walk, forcing Alou home. So, while it wasn't an official at-bat, he was awarded a run batted in, and the Yankees took a 1-0 lead.

Matty's brother, Felipe Alou, batted next, and doubled home Murcer and Nettles. (The 3rd Alou brother to make the major leagues, Jesús Alou, never played for the Yankees.) That gave the Yankees a 3-0 lead. But that would be the peak of the game for them. In the bottom of the 1st, Carl Yastrzemski hit a home run off Mel Stottlemyre. In the 2nd, Carlton Fisk hit a home run, and a Nettles error led to a 5-3 Boston lead. Although Nettles would become one of the greatest fielding 3rd basemen of all time, he was off to a difficult start with the Yankees.

In the top of the 3rd, Nettles hit a home run, and Blomberg beat out an infield single. But the Yankee rally stalled. The Sox scored 3 more runs in the bottom of the inning. Fisk hit another home run, a grand slam off Lindy McDaniel, in the bottom of the 4th. Blomberg lined out to 2nd to end the top of the 5th, and flew out to left in the top of the 8th, to end the day 1-for-3 with an RBI.

Orlando Cepeda, the former star 1st baseman for the San Francisco Giants and the St. Louis Cardinals, had been suffering from a bad knee for a few years, and the DH gave him the chance to hit without having to play the field. He had been the 1st player signed specifically to take the function. In spite of his team's win, he did not do well that day, going 0-for-6.

When the damage was done, and the final out was in the books, it was Red Sox 15, Yankees 5. A nice Opening Day for New England; for the New York Tri-State Area, not so much.

Here's how the other original DHs, and their teams, did that day:

* The Baltimore Orioles beat the Milwaukee Brewers, 10-0 at Memorial Stadium in Baltimore. Terry Crowley of the Orioles went 2-for-4. Ollie Brown of the Brewers went 0-for-3. Brooks Robinson, by this point regarded as the greatest 3rd baseman of all time, hit 2 home runs.

* The California Angels beat the Kansas City Royals, 3-2 at Anaheim Stadium. (It's now named Angel Stadium of Anaheim.) For the Royals, Ed Kirkpatrick went 1-for-3. For the Angels, Tommy McCraw went 1-for-4.

However, when Frank Robinson was injured, McCraw was shifted to his position in left field. As a result, the Angels became the 1st team to forfeit the DH, and have their pitcher bat anyway. Nolan Ryan thus became the 1st pitcher who could have had to bat in a game despite having had a DH, although his spot in the order did not come up. He went on to have one of the greatest seasons any pitcher has ever had.

* The Minnesota Twins beat the Oakland Athletics, 8-3 at the Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum. For the Twins, Tony Oliva went 2-for-4, including the 1st home run by a DH, off Jim "Catfish" Hunter, and 3 RBIs. For the A's, Bill North became the 1st DH to bat leadoff, and went 2-for-5.

*

Ron Blomberg would be the Yankees' main DH for the 1973 and '74 seasons. But injuries ruined his career: He played in only 34 games in 1975, just 1 in 1976, and none in 1977. He enjoyed a brief revival in 1978 with the Chicago White Sox, but that was it. He finished his career with a lifetime batting average of .293.

He continues to identify as a Yankee, and usually returns for Old-Timers' Day. I once saw him hit a home run in an Old-Timers' Game.

On April 7, 1973, the DH debuts continued. The Cleveland Indians beat the Detroit Tigers, 2-1 at Cleveland Municipal Stadium. Gates Brown of the Tigers and John Ellis of the Indians both went 0-for-4. (Gates was no relation to Ollie Brown, but Ollie was the brother of Pro Football Hall-of-Famer Willie Brown.)

And the Chicago White Sox beat the Texas Rangers, 3-1 at Arlington Stadium in the Dallas suburb of Arlington, Texas. Dick Allen hit a home run for the ChiSox, but he was not their DH. Mike Andrews -- perhaps foreshadowing his difficulties in that season's World Series -- was, and he went 1-for-3. For the Rangers, Rico Carty went 1-for-4.

Ron Blomberg, Orlando Cepeda, Terry Crowley, Tommy McCraw, Tony Oliva, Bill North, Mike Andrews and Rico Carty entered the 2023 season still alive. Ed Kirkpatrick died in 2010, Gates Brown in 2013, Ollie Brown in 2015, and John Ellis in 2022.
Ron Blomberg, throwing out the ceremonial first ball
at the new Yankee Stadium, April 4, 2023

Cepeda was elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame, but as a 1st baseman. Elected with their main "position" being DH have been Paul Molitor, Edgar Martinez, and, most dubiously of all, the steroid cheat David Ortiz.

*

I have listened. I have considered. I have rejected. I came, I saw, and now I shall conquer. To wit:

On the ridiculous "strategy" argument: "Managing in the American League is much more difficult for that reason. In the National League, my situation is dictated for me. If I'm behind in the game, I've got to pinch-hit. I've got to take my pitcher out. In the American League, you have to zero in. You have to know exactly when to take them out of there. In the National League, that's done for you." -- Jim Leyland, current manager of the Detroit Tigers. One of only 4 managers to win Pennants in both leagues.

Not to mention that, prior to 1990 or so, when managers messed things up by making umpteen pitching changes in a game (I call it the Great LaRussification), the DH thus allowed more pitchers to pitch complete games, thus saving your bullpen.

On the "pitchers can throw at guys without fear" argument: "The DH took away the fear of retribution by a pitcher who knowingly threw at a hitter, and allowed the umpire to control the game, instead of the 'unwritten rule' in baseball that left it up to the players to decide when action should be taken." -- Frank Quilici, player-manager for the Twins when the DH came in.

Also, plenty of pitchers were headhunters in the pre-DH days, including Bob Gibson, Don Drysdale, Early Wynn, Allie Reynolds and Sal Maglie. The thought of getting plunked themselves didn't stop them. Come to think of it, Gibson, Drysdale and Wynn were, by pitchers' standards, decent hitters.

And Pedro Martinez hit guys on purpose with the Dodgers and Expos, and now that he's back with the Mets -- when he pitches at all, that is -- he remains the same punk he has always been.

Even Roger Clemens, in his first game at Shea after the Piazza broken-bat incident, stood in there like a man and let Shawn Estes try to throw at him -- and miss -- and hit a double, though he went on to lose the game.

Let's not forget that there's no reason a pitcher whose teammate got hit has to wait for the other team's pitcher to come up. Say Josh Beckett of the Red Sox hits Derek Jeter of the Yankees on purpose. (I know, you've really gotta use your imagination here.) Does this mean the Yankee pitcher has to wait for Beckett to come to the plate -- which will never happen as long as he stays in the AL? Of course not. "You hit my captain, I hit yours." Take that, Jason Varitek. Or, "You hit my marquee player, I hit yours." Take that, David Ortiz. And if the Sox get angry about it, bring it the hell on, and we'll see who's man enough and who's just Manny.

On the "not a complete player" argument: "Any DH can field any position better than any pitcher can hit." -- Steve Lyons. The former outfielder and Fox Sports baseball analyst may have been nicknamed "Psycho," but he's right.

On the "old guys" and "injured guys" argument: Only a fool would rather see a pitcher batting .125 come to the plate instead of a 38-year-old injured fat man batting .225. Anybody who wants to see a pitcher come to the plate is accepting worse than mediocrity: He's accepting inadequacy. And anybody who will accept inadequacy has no credibility.

Every time I see a big-league pitcher come to the plate and strike out, I think, "Hey, (team owner's name)! Pay me a million bucks a year, and I'll play every 5 days and bat .125!"

On the "nine players on a team, not ten" argument: This one is really stupid. It's actually 25 players on a team.

To use the "nine players" argument, that means that not only will you only be able to play the same nine players every day, but can you imagine every pitcher going the entire game? He can't be relieved, since "A baseball team has only nine players!"

And what about the next day? "Batting 8th, the shortstop, Number 35, Mike Mussina, Number 35. And batting 9th, the pitcher, Number 2, Derek Jeter, Number 2." Tomorrow, A-Rod pitches. The next day, Jason Giambi. It's only 9 players, remember?

On the "purity" argument: What about artificial turf? The NL started it with the Astrodome in 1965. From 1982 to '92, and again in '98 and the first half of '99, the AL had 4 out of 14 parks with artificial turf, their all-time peak. From 1971 to '78 -- including the AL's 1st 6 years with the DH -- the NL had the plastic stuff in 7 of 12 parks. More than half.

True, the NL was the first to eliminate the plastic stuff completely, when the Montreal Expos became the Washington Nationals; while the AL, following the opening of the new Minnesota park in 2010, will still have it in the retractable-roof stadium of Toronto and the permanent roof stadium of Tampa Bay (assuming the Rays aren't moved). But the AL isn't the league whose fans were screaming "Purity!" The NL was, and was more than half-plastic in the peak years of DH-hatred.

But, hey, if you really want to have baseball the way it was meant to be played, why stop with junking the DH?

Let's have "real baseball." No artificial turf. No domes. No lights. No electric scoreboards. No foreign-born players. No non-white players. No major league teams south of the Potomac and Ohio Rivers, none west of the Mississippi River except for St. Louis. A distance of just 50 feet from the pitcher's mound to home plate. And only underhand pitching.

In fact, let's bring back the reserve clause. No, let's go back further than that: Let's have only amateur baseball. No pay. And when a player gets hurt, no X-rays. No antibiotics. No whirlpools. No anesthetic. Let's use pre-Civil War medicine. After all, we want baseball to remain pure, don't we?

As the great New York sportscaster Warner Wolf would say, "Come on, give me a break!"

Of course, nobody would want all that. This doesn't quite go all the way back to prehistoric times, but figuring out that changing the above -- including the adoption of the DH -- is so easy, a caveman could do it.

Why, even a Met fan... Well, maybe not. Met fans defy the theory of evolution, anyway.

The DH is good. The DH is right. The DH works. The arguments against it do not. Welcome to the 21st Century. Baseball is a great game, perhaps now more than ever.

In 2022, Baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred mandated a "universal DH." Now, the National League uses it, too. And, just like when the American League adopted it in 1973, the world didn't come to an end.

In 1973, the AL as a whole had a higher batting average than the NL. That was the case every single season, from 1973 to 2021, including 2020 when, due to COVID instituting travel restrictions and a temporary emergency realignment, both Leagues had to use the DH.

The 2022 season was the 1st with both Leagues using the DH, leaving the Central League in Japan as the last top-flight league, anywhere in the world, not using it. All those people complaining that the DH is "not real baseball" -- well, that argument went out the window 7 years before the DH came, in 1966, when artificial turf was first used. In 2022, for the 1st time in the DH Era, the NL had a higher overall batting average than the AL -- barely: .243 to .242.

But I still hate artificial turf. And domes. And Interleague Play. But I still support the DH, and, aside from updating the names used in this post, I see no reason to change anything I said here.

Saturday, June 20, 2015

My Periodic Grouse About How Interleague Play Has to Go

George Carlin, author of (among other things) the legendary Baseball and Football routine, once remarked that "fat chance" and "slim chance," which you would think would have opposite meanings, actually mean the same thing.

Well, "This has to stop" and "This has to go" mean roughly the same thing.

Interleague Play has to stop. Interleague Play has to go. It's inconvenient and stupid. Or (profanity alert), as Carlin would have said, it's "stupid, full of shit, and fuckin' nuts!"

Thanks to a quirk of the Interleague schedule, the Yankees played a 4-game series with the Marlins -- 2 in Miami, then 2 in New York.

Really, if you're going to do stuff like this, just scrap the old Leagues entirely, and have an Eastern Conference and a Western Conference.

The following, of course, depends on no teams moving. Considering the current states of the A's and Rays, the current 30-team map cannot be guaranteed beyond the year 2020 or so.

Eastern Conference
Atlantic Division - 8
Baltimore Orioles
Boston Red Sox
Miami Marlins
New York Mets
New York Yankees
Philadelphia Phillies
Tampa Bay Rays
Washington Nationals

Midwest Division - 7
Chicago Cubs
Chicago White Sox
Cincinnati Reds
Cleveland Indians
Detroit Tigers
Pittsburgh Pirates
Toronto Blue Jays

Western Conference
Midwest Division - 7
Atlanta Braves
Houston Astros
Kansas City Royals
Milwaukee Brewers
Minnesota Twins
St. Louis Cardinals
Texas Rangers

Pacific Division - 8
Arizona Diamondbacks
Colorado Rockies
Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim
Los Angeles Dodgers
Oakland Athletics
San Diego Padres
San Francisco Giants
Seattle Mariners

Two conferences of 15 teams, each with a division of 7 and a division of 8. Granted, this would break up the Cubs-Cardinals rivalry, but nobody outside their fanbases thinks it's much of a rivalry. When have they ever had big late-season matchups in the TV era, like Yankees-Red Sox or Dodgers-Giants? This would also render Brewers vs. either Chicago team a less frequent matchup.

But most rivalries would be preserved, and some would even be strengthened, such as the Orioles with the Phillies and the Nationals, and a battle for the South with the Braves, Cardinals, Royals, Rangers and Astros.

Since the year 2000, the following has been true. The offices of the American League and the National League have been shut down. The office of President of each League is now purely ceremonial, and the duties consist almost entirely of awarding the League's championship trophy. (Each has an actual trophy, in addition to being able to raise a flag or "pennant.") And there's no longer separate umpiring crews for each League.

So why haven't the Leagues been scrapped entirely?

Two reasons. Both of them are monumentally stupid.

1. The National League team owners don't want to use the designated hitter.

he "purity" explanation is stupid. "Baseball is played by 9 men, not 10." No, it's played by 25 men. You don't see a guy pitching one day, then playing shortstop the next 4 days, then pitching again, do you? And you have heard of pinch hitters and relief pitchers, haven't you?

And the NL is not "pure": When the DH came to the AL in 1973, 7 of the 12 NL clubs, more than half, were playing home games on artificial turf. And you bozos never had a problem with that.

Grow up, morons: It's the 21st Century, and the only people who want to see pitchers bat are people who refuse to give up their manual typewriters and rotary dial phones.

Reason 1 is a symptom of Reason 2.

2. It's the way it's always been done, so why change?

Because lights. Because integration. Because electric scoreboards. Because retractable roofs (which means that artificial turf is no longer necessary, Toronto!). Because radio. Because television. Because ESPN and the Internet mean that, if you live in the Eastern Time Zone, you no longer have to wait until Wednesday morning's paper to see evidence of that no-hitter that was pitched in the Pacific Time Zone on Monday night.

Either have separate Leagues, only playing each other in spring training (when the Florida/Arizona geographical divide messes things up anyway) and in the World Series, or don't.

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Sympathy for the Designated Hitter

"Please allow me to introduce myself. I'm a man of wealth and taste." -- the Rolling Stones

OK, so my favorite athlete of all time, occasional designated hitter Reggie Jackson, wasn't actually the Devil, contrary to the opinions of many Red Sox and Mets fans, and a few Dodger fans still whining about Game 4 of the 1978 World Series, but I don't give a damn what they think.

Reggie was, however, and remains, a man of wealth and taste -- and there's not many people who peaked in popularity in the 1970s about whom it can be said they were people of taste.

The designated hitter, or "DH," has been used in the American League since 1973, and hated by the National League and its fans ever since. DH-haters have come up with many reasons why they hate it.

These people are morons.

They may be pretty smart when it comes to other subjects, but when it comes to the DH, they are freakin' morons.

Let me explain it, and preface it by saying that, yes, I am a Yankee Fan, and therefore I prefer the American League. However, when you consider that more of the teams that I don't like (due to various tussles with the Yankees) are in the American League, I might actually be more disposed to listen to the National League's arguments.

I have listened. I have considered. I have rejected. I came, I saw, and now I shall conquer. To wit:

On the ridiculous "strategy" argument: "Managing in the American League is much more difficult for that reason. In the National League, my situation is dictated for me. If I'm behind in the game, I've got to pinch-hit. I've got to take my pitcher out. In the American League, you have to zero in. You have to know exactly when to take them out of there. In the National League, that's done for you." -- Jim Leyland, current manager of the Detroit Tigers. One of only 4 managers to win Pennants in both leagues.

Not to mention that, prior to 1990 or so, when managers messed things up by making umpteen pitching changes in a game (I call it the Great LaRussification), the DH thus allowed more pitchers to pitch complete games, thus saving your bullpen.

On the "pitchers can throw at guys without fear" argument: "The DH took away the fear of retribution by a pitcher who knowingly threw at a hitter, and allowed the umpire to control the game, instead of the 'unwritten rule' in baseball that left it up to the players to decide when action should be taken." -- Frank Quilici, player-manager for the Twins when the DH came in.

Also, plenty of pitchers were headhunters in the pre-DH days, including Bob Gibson, Don Drysdale, Early Wynn, Allie Reynolds and Sal Maglie. The thought of getting plunked themselves didn't stop them. Come to think of it, Gibson, Drysdale and Wynn were, by pitchers' standards, decent hitters.

And Pedro Martinez hit guys on purpose with the Dodgers and Expos, and now that he's back with the Mets -- when he pitches at all, that is -- he remains the same punk he has always been.

Even Roger Clemens, in his first game at Shea after the Piazza broken-bat incident, stood in there like a man and let Shawn Estes try to throw at him -- and miss -- and hit a double, though he went on to lose the game.

Let's not forget that there's no reason a pitcher whose teammate got hit has to wait for the other team's pitcher to come up. Say Josh Beckett of the Red Sox hits Derek Jeter of the Yankees on purpose. (I know, you've really gotta use your imagination here.) Does this mean the Yankee pitcher has to wait for Beckett to come to the plate -- which will never happen as long as he stays in the AL? Of course not. "You hit my captain, I hit yours." Take that, Jason Varitek. Or, "You hit my marquee player, I hit yours." Take that, David Ortiz. And if the Sox get angry about it, bring it the hell on, and we'll see who's man enough and who's just Manny.

On the "not a complete player" argument: "Any DH can field any position better than any pitcher can hit." -- Steve Lyons. The former outfielder and Fox Sports baseball analyst may have been nicknamed "Psycho," but he's right.

On the "old guys" and "injured guys" argument: Only a fool would rather see a pitcher batting .125 come to the plate instead of a 38-year-old injured fat man batting .225. Anybody who wants to see a pitcher come to the plate is accepting worse than mediocrity: He's accepting inadequacy. And anybody who will accept inadequacy has no credibility.

Every time I see a big-league pitcher come to the plate and strike out, I think, "Hey, (team owner's name)! Pay me a million bucks a year, and I'll play every 5 days and bat .125!"

On the "nine players on a team, not ten" argument: This one is really stupid. It's actually 25 players on a team.

To use the "nine players" argument, that means that not only will you only be able to play the same nine players every day, but can you imagine every pitcher going the entire game? He can't be relieved, since "A baseball team has only nine players!"

And what about the next day? "Batting 8th, the shortstop, Number 35, Mike Mussina, Number 35. And batting 9th, the pitcher, Number 2, Derek Jeter, Number 2." Tomorrow, A-Rod pitches. The next day, Jason Giambi. It's only 9 players, remember?

On the "purity" argument: What about artificial turf? The NL started it with the Astrodome in 1965. From 1982 to '92, and again in '98 and the first half of '99, the AL had 4 out of 14 parks with artificial turf, their all-time peak. In 1977 and 1978, the NL had the plastic stuff in 7 of 12 parks. More than half. And 10 of the 12, all but the Chicago Cubs and the Los Angeles Dodgers, played in what were essentially football stadiums.

True, the NL was the first to eliminate the plastic stuff completely, when the Montreal Expos became the Washington Nationals; while the AL, following the opening of the new Minnesota park in 2010, will still have it in the retractable-roof stadium of Toronto and the permanent roof stadium of Tampa Bay (assuming the Rays aren't moved). But the AL isn't the league whose fans were screaming "Purity!" The NL was, and was more than half-plastic in the peak years of DH-hatred.

But, hey, if you really want to have baseball the way it was meant to be played, why stop with junking the DH?

Let's have "real baseball." No artificial turf. No domes. No lights. No electric scoreboards. No foreign-born players. No non-white players. No major league teams south of the Potomac and Ohio Rivers, none west of the Mississippi River except for St. Louis. A distance of just 50 feet from the pitcher's mound to home plate. And only underhand pitching.

In fact, let's bring back the reserve clause. No, let's go back further than that: Let's have only amateur baseball. No pay. And when a player gets hurt, no X-rays. No antibiotics. No whirlpools. No anesthetic. Let's use pre-Civil War medicine. After all, we want baseball to remain pure, don't we?

As the great New York sportscaster Warner Wolf would say, "Come on, give me a break!"

Of course, nobody would want all that. This doesn't quite go all the way back to prehistoric times, but figuring out that changing the above -- including the adoption of the DH -- is so easy, a caveman could do it.

Why, even a Met fan... Well, maybe not. Met fans defy the theory of evolution, anyway.

The DH is good. The DH is right. The DH works. The arguments against it do not. Welcome to the 21st Century. Baseball is a great game, perhaps now more than ever.

UPDATE: In 2022, Baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred mandated a "universal DH." Now, the National League uses it, too. And, just like when the American League adopted it in 1973, the world didn't come to an end. Also, in 2022, for the 1st time since 1972, the NL had a higher overall batting average than the AL -- barely, .243 to .242.

But I still hate artificial turf. And domes. And Interleague Play. But I still support the DH, and, aside from updating the names used in this post, I see no reason to change anything I said here.