Showing posts with label conservative. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conservative. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 30, 2026

Conservatism Is a Racist Ideology

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States upheld "birthright citizenship."

In a case abbreviated as Trump v. Barbara, the Court recognized that it is explicitly guaranteed to anyone born under the legal "jurisdiction" of the U.S. federal government by the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, adopted on July 9, 1868), which states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

The vote was narrow as hell, though: 5-4. As expected, Associate Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Katanji Brown Jackson, liberals appointed by Presidents of the Democratic Party, supported birthright citizenship. But so did Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, both conservative Justices appointed by Presidents of the Republican Party -- including Barrett, appointed by Donald Trump.

The other four Associate Justices, all archconservatives appointed by Republican Presidents, voted against it: Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh.

Once again, the Supreme Court matters. Trump -- or, if something happens to him, Vice President JD Vance taking his place -- has two and a half years left in his term. And Thomas is 78 years old, Alito is 76, Sotomayor is 72, and Roberts is 71. There's a huge chance that whoever is President between now and January 20, 2029 will have to replace one of them, and a good chance that he'll have to replace at least two. The President elected on November 7, 2028 and taking office on January 20, 2029 will almost certainly inherit those new Justices, and, if not, have to replace them and the others.

Since taking office for a 2nd term as President on January 20, 2025, Donald Trump has demanded that the U.S. Supreme Court ignore this vital part of the Constitution, and declare that only children born to parents who are both citizens of the U.S. shall be recognized as citizens of the U.S.

This is anti-immigration rhetoric, aimed largely at black and Spanish-speaking people. It is racist. It is disgusting. It is immoral. It is un-American. And, while the 1st Amendment means that this shouldn't be an issue, so many people claiming it to be true also lie and say they follow Jesus, so I'm going to add this: It is un-Christian.

*

Conservatism is the ideology of racism. From 1837 onward, after the populist Andrew Jackson left office, the Democratic Party was the party of conservatism. Then, after the American Civil War, without Abraham Lincoln to keep an eye on them any longer, the members of the Republican Party saw how much money they'd made on railroads and armaments, and decided they didn't want to pay taxes on that income, and became conservative. This led to the Compromise of 1877, which ended Reconstruction, and thus ended the official move for civil rights in America, for black people and for women. (Hispanics weren't even being considered, although there were moves, even then, to limit immigration from Asia.)

So, at this point, we had two conservative parties, to the point where the Republicans threw former President Theodore Roosevelt out in 1912, when he campaigned to return to the office, on things like universal health coverage and old-age pensions -- essentially, what became Social Security.

Starting in 1932, with Franklin Roosevelt and the New Deal, the Democratic Party returned to liberalism, except for their Southern wing, which, while taking in the money from New Deal's liberal projects, remained racist and conservative.

In 1964, the outside-the-South Democrats joined with reasonable Republicans to pass the Civil Rights Act. The most conservative Republicans appealed to the Southern Democrats, and say, "You don't like it? Join us." And they did. And that's where we are now.

So when Republicans call the Democrats the party of racism and the party of the Ku Klux Klan, it's no more true today than the Republicans being the party of Lincoln. Today's racists are united in their support of the Republicans, and of Donald Trump.

And let's drop this myth of "Conservatism is opposed to big government." Conservatives have always believed in big government when it comes to fighting their enemies. Since World War II, they've never had a problem with expanding the Department of Defense, or the CIA, or the FBI. Because that involves spending taxpayers' money. The only time they want smaller government is when bigger government makes them spend more of their own money.

Monday, January 5, 2026

Hard Work

The demolition of Trump Plaza, Atlantic City, February 17, 2021

Well, it's a New Year, meaning holiday-season "seasonal jobs" are about to come to an end, and unemployment is going up again.

In other words, Trump will lie and say he's brought it down.

Of course, when a Democratic President brings unemployment down, people who simp for conservatism will say that these are "people who have stopped looking for work." Retirees, people who have become too disabled to work (temporarily or otherwise), or people who are, in these simpers' minds, just plain lazy. (Right, as if Reagan, Dubya Bush and Trump weren't the 3 laziest Presidents of all time.)

The great comedian George Carlin liked to say, "Most people work just hard enough to not get fired, because they get paid just enough to not quit." He also said: "If work is so great, how come they have to pay you to do it?"

There's an old saying: "Hard work never killed anybody, but why take the risk?" In fact, hard work has killed a lot of people, sometimes all at once, sometimes over time. It's why we have labor laws and OSHA.

These men who have "stopped looking for work" don't have the incentive. Why risk death or permanent injury for low pay and low or nonexistent benefits? If the CEO doesn't care enough about his employees to treat them well, why should we be his employees?

This is not laziness, this is self-preservation -- something you would think Republicans, with selfishness being the leading trait of conservatism, would understand, and they would want to do something about it.

But no: Their own selfishness triumphs over the workers' desire to do an honest day's work for an honest day's pay and to be safe while doing it.

Let's face it: If how hard we worked, alone, determined our success levels, then a coal miner would have become President by now, and Trump would be homeless.

Instead of casinoless. And feckless. And heartless. And brainless. And moralless.

Monday, November 4, 2024

Is Trump "Hitler"?

Every politician gets compared, by people who don't like him or her, to Adolf Hitler, Chancellor of Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1945.

Donald Trump, more than most. Even his own current Vice Presidential nominee, J.D. Vance, once called him "America's Hitler."

But that's not fair. Only Hitler was really Hitler, right?

Well:

* Hitler appealed to bigotry, both racial and religious. So has Trump.

* Hitler treated his country as miserable, with the need to make it great again. So has Trump.

* Hitler finished first in an election, even though he didn’t get a majority of the popular vote. So did Trump.

* Hitler wanted things in popular culture that he didn’t like, as we would say today, "canceled." So does Trump.

* Hitler called people in the media that criticized him "the enemy" and said they were lying, when he knew damn well that they were telling the truth. So does Trump.

* Hitler valued personal loyalty, loyalty to him, above all. So has Trump.

* Hitler took the greatest offense at people who were once loyal to him turning coat. So has Trump.

* Hitler let big business do whatever they wanted, so long as they were loyal to him. So has Trump.

* Hitler established concentration camps for people he deemed inferior and/or criminals. So did Trump. In Hitler's case, they weren't only limited to along his country's border. In Trump's case, they weren't slave labor camps, and didn't become death camps -- at least not intentionally.

* Hitler thought he knew more than his generals did. He didn't. The same is true of Trump.

* Hitler wasn't much of a sports fan, but he understood how sports success could be used for propaganda purposes. The same is true for Trump: He used to go to Yankee games, but he went there for business networking. Now, he can't show his face in the new Yankee Stadium, because he'd get the hell booed out of him.

* Hitler had a thing for much-younger blondes. So does Trump.

* Hitler lied. About everything. So does Trump.

* Hitler usually wore boots to make himself look taller. Trump wears lifts on his shoes.

* Hitler was addicted to cocaine and methamphetamines. Trump is believed to be addicted to both cocaine and Adderall.

* According to his surviving medal records, among the reasons Hitler took drugs was to cure flatulence. Trump has been accused of severe flatulence while sitting in court.

* Hitler was at his happiest when he was cheered by adoring crowds during his lie-filled, bigotry-filled speeches. So is Trump.

* Hitler was impersonated and mocked, in his own time, by Charlie Chaplin, who, though a genius, was a sex fiend who liked 'em young. Trump has been impersonated and mocked, in his own time, by Alec Baldwin, who doesn’t even have genius status.

* Hitler survived an assassination attempt. So has Trump -- or so he would like us to believe.

* Hitler has been featured in three episodes of the Internet series Epic Rap Battles of History. So has Trump. (A fourth has now happened.)

* And when his reign came to an end, Hitler's country needed serious rebuilding. The same was true of Trump.

There is, of course, a huge difference: When Hitler's reign came to an end, he was dead. When Trump's reign came to an end, he was still alive, and began to build a new regime, with a chance of achieving it.

One more big difference: Hitler refused to be captured by the Russians in the end, while Trump allowed himself to be captured by the Russians in the beginning.

*

So: Is Trump "Hitler"? No. Is he bad enough? Yes.

So you can't sit this one out. You have to vote. And you can't vote third-party, just because you think the Democrats are "corporatist" or you believe the bald-faced lie that it is Israel that is committing "genocide" in Gaza, when it is Hamas whose own stated reason for existence is genocide.

You're not going to get your perfect candidate for President. You have either Kamala Harris or Donald Trump. Harris would be a great candidate against anybody. Trump is absolutely unacceptable against anybody.

You can't say, "I disagree with her on this one issue, therefore I can't vote for her."

That kind of thinking prevented Hubert Humphrey from winning in 1968, and we got Richard Nixon.

It prevented Jimmy Carter from winning in 1980, and we got Ronald Reagan.

It prevented Al Gore from winning in 2000, and we got George W. Bush.

It prevented Hillary Clinton from winning in 2016, and we got Donald Trump.

Every time that kind of thinking takes hold, the people thinking it end up getting the President who is the least like the one they really wanted.

This time, there is no other option: A vote for anyone other than Harris, including a vote for no one at all, is a vote for Trump, which is a vote for absolute Fascism.

Harris is not perfect. But she is a good person, with good ideas. Benjamin Netanyahu is evil. So is Hamas. They cancel each other out. Throw the issue out. It does not matter in this election, not one damned bit. The only issue that matters is preventing Fascism. Which means stopping Trump.

I cannot make it any clearer than that. Vote for Harris this time, and you can vote for whoever you want next time -- because there will be a next time. If Trump wins this time, there won't be a next time for a long time to come, if at all.

Donald Trump tells people, "You've been through tough times. It's not your fault. See those people over there? It's their fault! Vote for me, and I will punish them for you!"

Four years ago, Joe Biden told people, "You've been through tough times. So have I. I understand. Together, we can make the times better."

Now, Kamala Harris can tell people, "Joe was right. Together, we made the times better. But we have more to do. Together, we can do it!"
It will be a tough fight. As the lady says, "And when we fight, we win!"

Sunday, November 3, 2024

Conservatives vs. Liberals

Conservatives like to say, "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner."

Conservatism is the wolves having steak, and telling the lambs that there will be some left over. Whether the wolves are telling the truth or lying doesn't matter: Lambs are sheep, and sheep don't eat meat.

Liberalism is 100 rams head-butting the wolves, and then leading the lambs to proper food.

*

In 1776, the conservatives wanted to stay loyal to the British crown. The liberals said no, we have to declare independence.

In 1860, the conservatives, then the Democrats, said you can't do anything about slavery, and you shouldn't. The liberals, then the Republicans, said we must, and we will.

In 1900, the conservatives, by this point an unholy union of Republicans and Southern Democrats, said we can't write laws to protect working people, because it would encourage laziness. The liberals, by this point a union that only lasted a few years, of Democrats outside the South and a few Midwestern and Western Republicans, said that working people need protection.

In 1932, the conservatives said the federal government can't do anything to fix the Depression, and it shouldn't. The liberals said we must, and we will.

In 1941, the conservatives said we shouldn't go to war with Hitler, because he's fighting Communists. The liberals said we must, because he's a Fascist, and if we don't stop him, he'll do to us what he's doing to Europe.

In 1948, the conservatives said we have to roll Communism back. The liberals said containment was the way to go, because it would stop them and prevent World War III.

In 1962, the conservatives said we have to invade Cuba. The liberals said we have to find a solution that will avoid World War III.

In 1964, the conservatives said you can't pass civil rights laws, and you shouldn't. The liberals said we must, and we will.

In 1968, the conservatives said the Vietnam War was wrong because it was ineffective, and we can fight it better. The liberals said it's wrong because it's immoral.

In 1973, the conservatives said Richard Nixon is not a crook. In 1974, the liberals said, "See? We told you he is."

In 1980, Ronald Reagan said he could cut taxes on the rich, increase defense spending, and balance the budget by 1984. In 1982, the liberals said, "Congratulations, stupid: You vastly increased the deficit, and you took us from 7 to 11 percent unemployment. Now, we're going to raise taxes and save Social Security, and you're going to sign it, or else your next movie role is going to be in The Herbert Hoover Story." Reagan wasn't completely stupid: He signed the tax increase.

In 1992, the conservatives said it's a minor recession. The liberals said you're the ones who smoked and inhaled.

In 1998, the conservatives said character matters. The liberals said if it mattered as much as you say it does, half of you would be gone.

In 2008, the conservatives said we need to win the Iraq War, and let the auto industry go bankrupt. The liberals said we need to end the Iraq War now, and save the auto industry.

In 2020, the conservatives said COVID was a hoax, it will go away soon, protect yourself by injecting (fill in the cure of the month). The liberals said America is smarter than that.

In 2022, the conservatives said there is no right to an abortion. The liberals said you no longer have the right to use the word "freedom," because you just took one of the most important freedoms away, and we will make you pay at the ballot box, and we did, and we are still doing it.

Every single time an important decision had to be made by the country, the conservatives have been wrong, and the liberals have been right.

Take that thought to the polls.

Wednesday, January 31, 2024

Taylor the WAG

Conservative media is now claiming that the National Football League is rigging the Super Bowl, so that the Kansas City Chiefs, and therefore Travis Kelce, and therefore Taylor Swift, will win; so that Taylor can then ride that to help President Joe Biden get re-elected.

It's not the craziest conspiracy they've ever come up with. But it's one of the dumber ones. Why the hell would the NFL rig the Super Bowl for the Chiefs? There's 3 big reasons why they wouldn't do that:

1. They wouldn't rig it at all. They want people to bet on the game. Therefore, they would want the game to appear to be on the level.

2. What's the point? The Chiefs are the defending Champions. They don't need the rigging.

3. Of the NFL's 32 teams, 28 are owned by contributors to Donald Trump's Presidential campaign. Clearly, they don't want Biden to win.

Of course, the right-wingers are ready, either way. If the San Francisco 49ers win, they'll say it was rigged to help liberal San Francisco against conservative Missouri and Kansas. So, either way, they look like idiots.

*

Anyway... Today, on The View on ABC, Sara Haines made the point that American football has places for women: As cheerleaders, and in the stands. Their place is not by the side of their boyfriend or husband, the player.

And they see Taylor Swift cozying up to Travis Kelce, star tight end of the Kansas City Chiefs, and his family. And they don't like it.

They also don't like that she's registering voters to vote the way she would want them to: For Democrats, for women's rights, and other liberal causes.

Yes, Haines used the phrase "American football." That's important. Because, whether she meant to or not, it draws a contrast to soccer, the sport the rest of the world calls "football."

In England, they have "WAG Culture." WAG: Wives And Girlfriends. If an English soccer star, or a foreign soccer star in England's Premier League, still the highest-grossing sports league in the world -- ahead of the mighty NFL, mind you -- has a girlfriend or a wife (hopefully, not both) who is also famous, it provides the same kind of effect as when Joe DiMaggio and Marilyn Monroe got married (and, just as quickly, divorced): Each builds on the other's fame, until, on top of what they were already famous for, they become "famous for being famous."

America isn't used to that. Reggie Jackson was very good at keeping his private life private: He married once, was divorced while still in Oakland, and if he ever dated a famous woman while in the markets of New York (with the Yankees) or Los Angeles (with the team then named the California Angels), the media never found out.

Also in Reggie's time, nobody seemed to care who Pete Rose, Johnny Bench, Carl Yastrzemski, George Brett, Ozzie Smith, Rickey Henderson, Don Mattingly or Ryne Sandberg was married to. Derek Jeter and Alex Rodriguez both dated famous women, but that was in New York, which isn't like the rest of the country.

In other sports, Joe Montana's wife was Jennifer Wallace, and Wayne Gretzky's wife was Jennifer Jones, and neither was ever anything more than a minor actress. Michael Jordan and Dan Marino had embarrassing divorces, but they were quickly forgotten. We hear lots of talk about LeBron James' son Bronny, but how many of us recognize the name of Savannah Brinson, LeBron's wife and Bronny's mother?

Tom Brady was married to Gisele Bündchen, but that was treated as an afterthought. Patrick Mahomes, Chiefs quarterback and Kelce's teammate, having led them into a 4th Super Bowl and looking for a 3rd win, is the most famous player in the NFL, but how many of us would recognize his wife on sight? Or recognize her maiden name, Brittany Matthews? And she was a pro athlete, too, a soccer player. She's one of the co-owners of the K.C. area's team in the National Women's Soccer League, the Kansas City Current. And yet, she can walk through Port Authority Bus Terminal in Midtown Manhattan without one single autograph request. Her husband can't do that.

There's something else to consider about the Taylor & Travis phenomenon. Taylor Swift is the 1st female performer to be, unquestionably, the biggest music star in America. Every predecessor in that regard was male: Bing Crosby, Frank Sinatra, Elvis Presley, The Beatles (British rather than American, but embraced by America), Michael Jackson.

Not Madonna. When she first hit it big in 1984, Jackson, Bruce Springsteen and Prince were bigger. When she was at her most hyped and controversial, in 1989 and '90, Jackson was still bigger. So were imports U2. Janet Jackson was never the biggest. Nor was Jennifer Lopez. The Beehive won't like reading this, but Beyoncé has been with Jay-Z since 2002, and he's been either the biggest or 2nd-biggest hip-hop figure longer than that, so Bey has never even been the biggest performer in her own relationship.

Yes, there is an element of race involved. If Beyoncé had merely collaborated with Jay-Z, and never gotten into a relationship with him, she would still be very big. But being black would have prevented her from being the biggest star among white fans. Taylor doesn't have that issue. She does have issues, but not that one.

But Taylor got to where she is by writing and singing songs about a troublesome love-life. And while she did sing, "I'm the problem, it's me" in "Anti-Hero," a lot of her songs are about breakups with inadequate boyfriends.

Guys see this, and think, "If only she'd come to me, I could show her a real man." Then she starts dating a Super Bowl-winning football star, and they feel betrayed. And so they hate her.

And, like Mariah Carey a few years earlier, she can sing a song titled "Shake It Off." (Neil Sedaka also had a Number 1 hit titled "Bad Blood" decades before Taylor did.) And that just ticks them off more.

Let them be ticked off.

By the way, you should have seen the look on my face when I remembered that there were meat-packing companies named Taylor and Swift.

The Taylor Provisions Company, of course, invented pork roll, and still sell more of it than anybody else. They sell it under the name "Pork Roll." Not "Taylor Ham."

Saturday, July 15, 2023

Top 10 Reasons Conservatives Need to Shut Up About "Cancel Culture"


Well, I just found out that her granddaughter, Sarah Green, is not only gay, but has married a woman. She came out to her grandmother at age 21, after hearing her say something typically ignorant. Serves her right.

Wanda Sykes is a comedian. A very good one. She ticks some boxes that conservatives don't like. She's female. She's black. She's gay -- and married. She's smart. And, what is probably the topper for them, she's outspoken, and doesn't take any crap from anybody.

She recently had this to say about "cancel culture," which right-wingers believe targets them, especially:

To me, the whole complaint about cancel culture is a lot of men, especially straight men, who are just pissed that they can’t say things anymore, y’know?

And it’s not like you can't say these things. You can say them, but now there’s just consequences. So that’s why I say I can’t get canceled. Only God can say: "All right, Wanda, that’s enough."

In other words: Use a slur -- against someone's gender, race, religion, sexual orientation, or gender identity, or whatever other category I may be unintentionally overlooking -- and people will stand up and oppose you.

You have the right to say what you want, so long as it doesn't endanger others, the classic example being the yelling of "Fire!" in a crowded place when there is no fire. But you do not have the right to say such things on a public platform:

* If you are at work, and you call a black customer the N-word, you can be fired. You have the right to have a job, but you do not have the right to have that job.

* If you are on line at a store, and you call a Jewish person in front of you an anti-Semitic word, the store manager can say, "Get out, and don't ever come back." You have the right to eat, but you do not have the right to shop for your food at that store.

* If you are on a social media platform, like Facebook or Twitter, and an openly gay person says something you don't like, you are free to tell him you disagree (if it's an opinion) or that he's wrong (if it's a fact). But if you use a homophobic slur against him, that platform can delete your comment, give you a warning, suspend you for a day, suspend you for a week, or ban you entirely, depending on your record on that platform, or on the severity of the offense. You have the right to express your opinions, but you don't have the right to do so there.

* And if you are on a television program, and you say anything like the preceding, that network has the right to ban you. You are not being "silenced": Your voice still works. You are simply being prevented from saying what you want to say on that network.

All those examples are of private businesses doing what they want. Conservatives used to support that. Why not now? What are you, a Communist?

Furthermore, conservatives who get "canceled" usually find it much easier to come back than liberals who do. Racist and anti-Semite Mel Gibson got to make a comeback. Racist Roseanne Barr is working on one. Even Pat Buchanan might have made another comeback by now, if he weren't 84 years old.

And, of course, the biggest example of all: Donald Trump. How many things has he said that have been worthy of "cancellation"? Despite this, and despite currently being under a federal criminal indictment, he is still accepted by the wider culture, is still making public statements, and is still the frontrunner for the Republican Party's nomination for President in 2024.

That's for people right of center. For people left of center, it's been a completely different story.

Top 10 Reasons Conservatives Need to Shut Up About "Cancel Culture"

10. The Hollywood Ten. In 1947, Congress, through the House Un-American Activities Committee, held hearings investigating Communist influence in the American film industry. They were attempting to stop screenwriters accused of Communist activity, a group known as The Hollywood Ten.
Left to right: Ring Lardner Jr., John Howard Lawson,
Alvah Bessie, Albert Maltz, Herbert Biberman,
Lester Cole, Samuel Ornitz, Edward Dmytryk,
and Robert Adrian Scott. Not pictured: Dalton Trumbo.

There were anti-Semitic overtones to the hearings, as half of the Ten were Jewish: Alvah Bessie, Herbert Biberman, Lester Cole, Albert Maltz and Samuel Ornitz. Edward Dmytryk, Ring Lardner Jr., John Howard Lawson, Adrian Scott and Dalton Trumbo were not Jewish, although Lardner's 1st wife, Sylvia Schulman, was.

Regardless of religion, many people in Hollywood saw this persecution as the sort of thing the Nazis would have done, and this fed their outrage. Some of them were registered Republicans, but they couldn't accept this garbage. In particular, Lucille Ball (a Republican) and Humphrey Bogart (a Democrat) testified in such a way that it could only be described as an artful way of telling the HUAC members to go to Hell.

It ended up ineffective. Many of them found it impossible to get work in America, and moved to Europe. In 1960, Kirk Douglas asked Trumbo to write the script for the historical epic he wanted to star in, Spartacus, and that film's success helped break the blacklist.
Ring Lardner Jr., son of the famous sportswriter, wrote the script for the film version of M*A*S*H in 1970. He was the last surviving member of the Hollywood Ten, living until 2000.

Even fellow liberals turned on them, to an extent. Ezra Pound was a much-admired poet. He was also a mentally ill Fascist who made anti-American propaganda broadcasts from Benito Mussolini's Italy during World War II. And yet, though he (largely) agreed with them politically, novelist Norman Mailer once said he would rather read the works of Pound than those of the Hollywood Ten, because, in his opinion, Pound was a better writer.

9. Marsha Hunt. From 1937 to 1947, she was one of America's most popular actresses. But she joined the "Hollywood Fights Back" movement. When she got back to Los Angeles, she was told to renounce her public statements in Washington. She refused. She was able to make 2 movies in 1948, and 3 in 1949.
But in 1950, she was named as a potential Communist or Communist sympathizer, along with 151 other actors, writers, and directors, in the anti-Communist publication Red Channels. She was cast in no movies in 1950, '51 and '53; just 2 in '52, and just 1 each in '54, '55 and '56, before going into semi-retirement. In a 2012 interview, she said, "The town turned against us. Just about-face... I was appalled, hurt, shocked that journalism could be so far out in prejudice."

In 1971, a year after Trumbo's death, she appeared in a film version of his novel Johnny Got His Gun. In 1987, she appeared in an episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation, as an Admiral's wife. Her last role was in 2008, in The Empire State Building Murders.
Marsha Hunt, 2020, age 103

She died on September 7, 2022, as the last surviving blacklisted actor. At the age of 105, she remained unrepentant, because she wasn't a Communist, and still believed that what had already been done, before she stepped in, was unfair.

8. Lenny Bruce. He was the 1st comedian to get big using profanity and "sick humor." Typical of his material: "My wife caught me in bed with her mother. She said, 'You're sick!' I said, 'Why? She's your mother, not mine!'"

Bruce would joke about anything. Especially sex. And religion. Particularly the Catholic Church. In his routine, he called Pope John XXIII "John Baby." That, plus the fact that he was Jewish -- his real name was Leonard Alfred Schneider -- pissed off a lot of conservative people in "the establishment."
Yes, he made jokes about the Catholic Church.
No, here, he's not dressing like a priest to make a point.
He's wearing a "Nehru jacket," made popular
by the late Jawaharlal Nehru, Prime Minister of India.

And in the late 1950s and early 1960s, if "the establishment" decided you needed what we would now call "canceling," it meant you wouldn't get hired. And any place that would hire you might get closed down. It also meant that you could get arrested for using profanity onstage. That was the conservatives closing you down. The conservatives doing the canceling.

Bruce was convicted of obscenity. He appealed, all the way to the Supreme Court. Which, at perhaps the most liberal point in its history, overturned the conviction. However, it's been alleged that it did so only because, if Bruce were in prison, he could not continue to be publicly humiliated with more arrests. 

Some people even think he was murdered: In 1966, at age 40, he was found with a needle in his arm at his home in the Hollywood Hills. It was known that he had a drug problem, but this was a little too convenient for his fans.

7. The Doors. No, I'm not talking about the time they appeared on The Ed Sullivan Show on September 17, 1967, and got banned for Jim Morrison singing, "Girl, we couldn't get much higher" from their Number 1 hit, "Light My Fire."
I'm talking about the show at the Dinner Key Auditorium in Miami on March 1, 1969, when Morrison allegedly flashed the audience. No photographic evidence of it has ever surfaced, despite a few photographs from the concert having been made public.

Morrison was convicted of indecent exposure and profanity on September 20, 1970, and, though he remained free upon appeal, the band's concerts began to be canceled. They played only 2 more shows, in Dallas on December 11, 1970, and in New Orleans the next day. The appeal was never heard, because Morrison died in Paris on July 3, 1971.

6. Dan Rather. His long and distinguished career with CBS News included anchoring The CBS Evening News, starting in 1981. Previously the network's White House correspondent, he was already known to distrust conservatives, once openly challenging President Richard Nixon during a 1974 press conference.

On September 8, 2004, just as the Presidential election was entering its general election phase, he presented unauthenticated documents that showed that George W. Bush, running for re-election as President, frequently did not show up for duty with the Texas Air National Guard during his tenure there in 1972-73.
Even hardcore Republicans knew that the information he was presenting was true. It should have come out sooner, disqualifying Bush from being elected Governor of Texas in 1994 and 1998, let alone President in 2000 and 2004. But there wasn't enough evidence to back it up. Rather was suspended. Bush was re-elected in a close election. In 2005, CBS fired Rather.

5. Al Franken. One of the top comedians of the late 20th Century, the Saturday Night Live veteran had been elected to the U.S. Senate as a Democrat from his native Minnesota in 2008 and 2014. On January 2, 2018, he resigned from the Senate because of a photograph taken in 2006 -- before he was elected -- which appeared to show him in an act of sexual harassment.
His own Party refused to stand up for him. In particular, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of New York demanded that he resign.

No one would stand up and say, "Donald Trump has been proven, through his own recorded words, to have admitted to repeatedly doing things much worse than this. If Franken should resign his office, then Trump should resign his office first."

For the record, after the Access Hollywood Tape was released, one of the candidates Trump defeated for the Republican nomination for President, former Governor Jon Huntsman Jr. of Utah, demanded he resign from the ticket in favor of Vice Presidential nominee Mike Pence. So did 3 Republican members of the Senate and 4 from the House of Representatives.

Pence himself did not. Nor did the Chairman of the Republican National Committee, Reince Priebus. Nor did any member of the Republican Congressional leadership. Nor did any living former Republican President, Vice President, or nominee therefor.

Trump is a Republican, a conservative, and a "Christian." Like a bunch of hypocrites, his Party insured that he got to keep running for the Presidency. Franken is a Democrat, a liberal, and a Jew. Like a bunch of cowards, his Party abandoned him.

On March 17, 2019, Gillibrand announced that she was running for the Democratic nomination for President in 2020. Not only did she not make it to the 1st vote, the Iowa Caucuses, she didn't even get out of the Summer of the year before the election. Served her right.

4. Woody Allen. Let's be completely honest. His 1979 film Manhattan showed his middle-aged character dating a 17-year-old woman, played by Mariel Hemingway (Ernest's granddaughter, born a few months after he died in 1961). And starting a relationship with his college-age, if adult, adoptive daughter was, at the very least, weird.

But as long as we're being completely honest: Allen has now been with Soon-Yi Previn longer than he has been with all previous girlfriends combined. And he has never been criminally charged with abusing anyone. Nor has he been sued for it in court. If Mia Farrow, and those of her children who stand with her, are telling the truth, why don't they go to court and prove it? Then again, he hasn't sued Mia for defamation of character, either.
There are people who want us to treat Woody Allen as if he is Roman Polanski, who drugged and raped a 13-year-old girl, and then, when a judge threw out the deal he made to avoid prison time and publicly threatened him with 50 years, he fled the country. Well, Polanski got his day in court, and lost. Allen has never gotten his day in court. Therefore, he is still entitled to the presumption of innocence.

As with Al Franken, Lenny Bruce and some of the Hollywood Ten, there may also be anti-Semitism involved in the opposition to Allen. (Marsha Hunt and Dan Rather were not Jewish. Nor were any of The Doors.)

Thus far, while religion has been an issue on this list, race has not, not even Soon-Yi's status as an Asian-American: Woody is seen as the problem, not her. But here we go:

3. Janet Jackson. It was February 1, 2004. Facebook went online exactly 3 days later. Twitter was more than 2 years away. We had the Internet, but we didn't have "social media" as we now understand that term. Had I gone into a chat room, or onto a message board, or even clicked on a newspaper or TV network website, I would have found out what happened rather quickly. But there was no way to know within minutes what had happened. I literally didn't know about it until I woke up the next morning.

It was Super Bowl XXXVIII -- the Super Bowl with the longest Roman numeral yet -- at what's now named NRG Stadium in Houston. The New England Patriots won, beating the Carolina Panthers, 32-29. Fans of the other 30 teams were left talking about the halftime show, where Justin Timberlake ripped off a piece of Janet's costume, exposing one of her breasts.
The bulk of the public anger fell on Janet. The jokes from late-night comedians, while embarrassing and seeming to go on forever, turned out to be the least damaging part of it. Viacom and its subsidiaries, including CBS, MTV and Infinity Broadcasting, blacklisted her from their broadcasts.

"There are much worse things in the world," Janet said, "and for this to be such a focus, I don't understand."

From 1986 to 2001, she had 10 songs reach Number 1 on Billboard magazine's Hot 100 chart. Her next album, titled Damita Jo after her middle name, was released on March 30, 2004, 58 days after the incident, and none of the 3 singles from it cracked the Top 40. From 2006 to 2021, she would have only 2 singles that did.

She was 37 years old at the time of the incident, and still looked, moved and sounded great, so it's not like she was washed up. And her fans still sold out arenas all over the planet. But she has never again been a hitmaker.

And Timberlake? His next album came on September 8, 2006, and it produced 3 Number 1 hits. From 2006 to 2018, he had 18 Top 10 hits, 5 of them hitting Number 1.

He got off scot-free from hurting Janet's career. Just as he had gotten off scot-free from the way he treated Britney Spears, both while and after he was her girlfriend.

In 2021, a documentary about Britney's struggle to reclaim her legal rights aired, and it put Timberlake's actions and words -- toward her, and toward Janet -- in a new light. In an Instagram post, Timberlake said:

I am deeply sorry for the times in my life where my actions contributed to the problem, where I spoke out of turn, or did not speak up for what was right...

I understand that I fell short in these moments and in many others and benefited from a system that condones misogyny and racism...

I didn’t recognize it for all that it was while it was happening in my own life but I do not want to ever benefit from others being pulled down again.

I can do better and I will do better. 

He had better do better. To paraphrase one of his later hits, he was one of those other boys who don't know how to act.

2. The Beatles. They're Number 2 because they're the biggest act ever to get canceled. The only reason they're not Number 1 is that they got forgiven rather quickly.
In March 1966, Maureen Cleave, a reporter who befriended all 4 Beatles, and may have been the inspiration for John's affair-confessional song "Norwegian Wood," interviewed John, and she asked him about his thoughts on religion. He said, 

Christianity will go. It will vanish and shrink. I needn't argue about that; I'm right and I'll be proved right. We're more popular than Jesus now; I don't know which will go first – rock 'n' roll or Christianity.

People in Britain barely noticed: The article provoked no controversy there. Even in America, it took some time. But just before they left for the North American leg of their World Tour in August, the controversy exploded. Disc jockeys could be heard smashing Beatle records on the air, saying they'd never play another. Radio stations, especially in the South, held bonfires of Beatle records. The Ku Klux Klan picketed the band's shows in Washington and Memphis.

What's more, there were death threats. Now, John was scared: He had put his bandmates, and even their loved ones -- by this point, all of them except Paul McCartney were married, and John and Ringo Starr each had one son -- at physical risk. And so, for what turned out to be the only time in his public life, John Lennon ate crow, and apologized for something he'd said or done.
On August 11, the Beatles flew from London to Chicago, where the North American leg of their World Tour was to begin. That night, at the Astor Tower Hotel, at a press conference in front of TV cameras, John said, "I suppose if I had said television was more popular than Jesus, I would have got away with it. I'm sorry I opened my mouth. I'm not anti-God, anti-Christ, or anti-religion. I was not knocking it. I was not saying we are greater or better."
He stressed that he had been remarking on how other people viewed and popularized the band. He described his own view of God by quoting the Bishop of Woolwich, "not as an old man in the sky. I believe that what people call God is something in all of us."
He was adamant that he was not comparing himself with Christ, but attempting to explain the decline of Christianity in the U.K. He closed with what could be considered a halfhearted apology: "If you want me to apologize, if that will make you happy, then, okay, I'm sorry."
Shades of more recent "I'm sorry if I offended anyone" statements. But most American journalists accepted this.
The thing is, John was right. Granted, 2,000 years from now, if human civilization survives, there will likely be more Bibles sold than Beatle albums. But, at the time, kids were more interested in 4 young men from current Liverpool than in 1 young man from ancient Israel and his 12 disciples.

The people that freaked out over John's remarks shouldn't have asked, "How dare he say that?" They should have asked, "What can we do to make Jesus, once again, more popular than The Beatles?" (Disclaimer: I don't have an answer now, and I probably wouldn't have had an answer had I been around then.)

1. Michael Jackson. Up until July 15, 1993, 30 years ago today, he was untouchable, the biggest active hitmaker in the world, "the King of Pop." Then came the accusation that he had molested boys at his Neverland Ranch outside Santa Barbara, California. He intensely maintained his innocence for the rest of his life. The people who knew him the best -- or thought they did -- also stood up for him, and said he couldn't possibly have done those things, because it simply wasn't in his nature to hurt children.

In 2005, he went on trial on such a charge. He was acquitted. Many people presumed he'd done it and gotten away with it. And most of the people who stood by him and believed in his innocence were considered delusional.

I was born at the end of 1969, just as Michael became a star with his brothers in The Jackson Five. I was 13 when Thriller became the biggest album of all time. I was a grown man when the charges were first leveled. And I was middle-aged when he died in 2009, while he was still a figure of ridicule at best and disgust at worst.

For the life of me, I cannot believe that Michael Jackson would have ever intentionally hurt a child, either physically or emotionally. But I have to accept the possibility that he may have unintentionally hurt children.

Still, this wasn't like the O.J. Simpson case, where the evidence of guilt now seems clear. Or even the evidence in similar cases against Donald Trump. The evidence against Michael Jackson is not clear at all.

Maybe Michael was never quite as big as The Beatles, but their "cancellation" didn't last long. His is still in place, years after his death. And that's wrong. "Innocent until proven guilty."

Wednesday, November 4, 2020

November 4, 1980: Ronald Reagan Is Elected President

November 4, 1980, 40 years ago: Ronald Reagan, former actor and former Governor of California, begins an era of Republican dominance, winning 489 Electoral Votes to be elected President. George H.W. Bush, who had held several political posts, including Congressman from Texas and U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, was elected as his Vice President.

President Jimmy Carter, the Democratic incumbent, wins only 6 States: His home State of Georgia, his Vice President Walter Mondale's home State of Minnesota, Rhode Island, Maryland, West Virginia and Hawaii; plus the District of Columbia, for 49 Electoral Votes.

The popular vote was considerably closer, but still a very solid Republican win: Reagan won 51 percent, Carter 41 percent, and an independent candidate, Congressman John B. Anderson of Illinois, who had run in that year's Republican Primaries, 6.6 percent, though he didn't take a single County, let alone State, and didn't exceed 16 percent in any State.

The Republicans also gain control of the Senate, and what turns out to be not a numerical majority in the House of Representatives, but frequently a "working majority" of Republicans and conservative Southern and Western Democrats that occasionally outflanks the Speaker of the House, Thomas P. "Tip" O'Neill of Massachusetts.

The Congressmen elected in the Class of 1980 become known as "the Reagan Robots," for so rarely opposing him on any vote. The only ones left, 42 years later, are Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, and Congressmen Hal Rogers of Kentucky and Chris Smith of New Jersey's 4th District -- which was my family's District until the 1980 Census led to us being put into the 12th.

It was exactly 1 year since the Iran Hostage Crisis began. Carter would work almost literally to the last minute of his Administration, on January 20, 1981, to end it, before leaving for the Capitol with Reagan for the Inauguration ceremony. The announcement that the hostages were free was made at 12:35 PM Eastern Time, 35 minutes after Reagan took the Oath of Office.

Some conservative voters are so dumb (How dumb are they?), they believe Reagan deserves the credit for getting the hostages home. After all, he was President when they were freed; he hosted the welcome home ceremony at the White House a week later; and, they believe, the reason the Iranians let the hostages go was that they were afraid Reagan would drop an atomic bomb on them if they didn't let them go while Carter was still President.

These people are so dumb, they would probably not believe you if you told them that the U.S. win over the Soviet Union in the 1980 Winter Olympic hockey tournament happened while Carter, not Reagan, was President. But it did.