There have now been 8 Star Trek TV series. Here they are in chronological order, from our perspective:
1. 1966-69: Star Trek, a.k.a. Star Trek: The Original Series or TOS
2. 1973-74: Star Trek, a.k.a. Star Trek: The Animated Series or TAS
--. 1979-94: Movies based on The Original Series
3. 1987-94: Star Trek: The Next Generation, a.k.a. TNG
4. 1993-98: Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, a.k.a. DS9
--. 1994-2002: Movies based on The Next Generation
5. 1995-2001: Star Trek: Voyager, sometimes abbreviated to VOY
6. 2001-05: Enterprise, renamed Star Trek: Enterprise in 2003, sometimes abbreviated to ENT
7. 2017-current: Star Trek: Discovery, sometimes cheekily abbreviated to STD or Disco
8. 2020-current: Star Trek: Picard, a.k.a. STP
And here they are in chronological order, from their characters' perspective:
2151-61: Enterprise
2256-57: Discovery
2265-69: The Original Series
2269-70: The Animated Series
2272-93: Movies based on The Original Series
2364-70: The Next Generation
2369-75: DS9
2371-78: Voyager
2372-79: Movies based on The Next Generation
2399: Picard
I'll rank the movies another time. How should these TV series be ranked? I personally assigned a ranking of 0 to 10 for each season of each series, totaled them, and divided these figures by the shows' number of seasons, so that the longer series don't have the unfair advantage of having more good -- or the unfair disadvantage of having more bad -- episodes.
Here's what I came up with:
8. Discovery: 5.00. Horrible 1st season, the worst in Trek history, including the stupid "spore drive," the pointless profanity, and the overall darkness that made people think of J.J. Abrams' Trek that dare not speak its name. Speaking of which, Disco's redesign of the Klingons was nearly as stupid as those of the movies in question.
Unlike most Trek series, though, it was able to save itself before Season 3. The introduction of the Constitution-class USS Enterprise, complete with Captain Christopher Pike, Number One and young Spock helped a lot.
Is saying that the logical thing to do?
Perhaps not. But it is the human thing to do.
Sending the USS Discovery to the 32nd Century, with the implication that the United Federation of Planets has disintegrated, is troubling, especially for those of us who prefer a more optimistic Star Trek.
7. The Animated Series: 4.50. The least-seen series, mainly because it only aired once, on Saturday mornings in the days of Watergate, before being picked up by nostalgia-themed cable-TV networks. I didn't see it in full until 2018.
Saying it ran for 2 seasons isn't really fair: In total, it ran 22 episodes. Being animated, they could do things TOS simply couldn't, including much more fantastical species to be allies and opponents. And some of the stories were good, including giving Nichelle Nichols more to do as Nyota Uhura, and filling in some of Spock's background.
But the animation style now seems crude. It's comparable to another Filmation series of the period: Super Friends. If you can watch it for free, go ahead. But unless you're an absolutist who has to see everything Star Trek, and haven't yet seen it, don't spend money to do so.
6. Voyager: 5.86. Not only did this show fall victim to the 1st 2 seasons trap, but its 1st 2 seasons were the worst 1st 2 seasons of any Trek show. But Season 3 saw the transition from Kes to Seven of Nine, and switching the enemies from the Vidiians and the Kazon to the Hirogen and the Borg.
The show got considerably better, mixing in light episodes with dark ones, and, like DS9, having a fine 7th season and a very satisfying finale.
5. Picard: 6.00. Only 1 season to judge so far, and the dark tone of its 1st half was truly depressing. Nearly all of us wanted to see Jean-Luc Picard again -- and also ex-Borgs Seven of Nine, Hugh and Icheb -- but not like this. We certainly didn't want to see a 9/11 -- or, as the more proper metaphor turned out to be, a Reichstag Fire -- on Mars. And, yes, about half of the profanity would have been fine.
The series was saved by the reintroduction of Will Riker and Deanna Troi. The season finale polarized people, but I thought it was very appropriate, given the character (as in the personality and judgment) not just of Picard, but of Data. And the season did end on a very hopeful note. If they do make a 2nd and a 3rd season, and they're as good as the 1st, this show will gain on this list.
4. Enterprise: 6.25. The idea of a prequel series reminded us all that the original show was about the exploration of space, and of Gene Roddenberry's idea: A combination of "Hornblower in space" and "Wagon Train to the stars."
(Created by British author C.S. Forester, in novels published between 1937 and 1967, Horatio Hornblower was a sailor in Britain's Royal Navy between 1793 and 1848. Wagon Train was a Western airing from 1957 to 1965, switching from NBC to ABC in 1962.)
The novelty, and the fact that it was now the only Trek series on the air, helped. The 9/11 attacks coming just 15 days before its preselected premiere date didn't, and a lot of people who would have had great enthusiasm for the show lost it.
The 1st season was decent, if a bit frustrating, as we needed time to get to know these characters. The 2nd dragged a bit. The "Xindi arc" made the 3rd season compelling TV, even though it was even darker than the Dominion War arc on DS9. The 4th season, including the aftermath of the Xindi War, the look at pre-Spock Vulcan, and the start of the conflict with the Romulans, was interesting. The series finale was polarizing, but I admit that I liked it.
3. The Original Series: 6.33. The 1st season was unlike anything anyone had seen in science fiction before. In spite of some silliness, and some limitations due to the available technology (overuse of stock footage, papier-mache boulders), and the occasional overdoing-it of William Shatner, it holds up pretty well, and the 21st Century "remastering" helps. The 2nd season was even better.
True, the 3rd season, with the budget cuts and the production of Fred Freiberger, left a lot to be desired. If it had been allowed to be as good as the 1st 2, it would still top the list.
2. Deep Space Nine: 6.71. This one began in the shadow of The Next Generation, and fell victim to the pattern established by that show that it takes a Trek series 2 full seasons to really get going. But the 3rd season, with the introduction of the Dominion as a threat, and of the USS Defiant as a small but badass starship, helped.
"Why so serious?"
Yes, the later seasons of this 1st Trek series developed without the input of Roddenberry were dark. (And the writers pissed me off by saying that baseball had died on Earth after the 2042 World Series -- now just 22 years away.) But not entirely. And it had better character development than any other Trek series. (Heck, TOS and TAS had no character development, as nearly every episode was self-contained.)
DS9, a better show overall than TOS? I don't agree, but the math suggests otherwise. I think I can live with it.
1. The Next Generation: 6.86. Going into this show, my father, an original Trekkie from 1966, and I had hope, but not really expectations. Could they really copy what TOS had gotten right, and fix what went wrong? There were signs in the 1st 2 seasons that they would, but they made a lot of their own mistakes.
Season 3 changed everything, symbolized by a switch from the jumpsuits to more suitable uniforms. The mistakes got fewer. The cultural sensitivity was increased. The scripts got better. The character development got better. And then came "The Best of Both Worlds, Part I," Star Trek's 1st season-ending cliffhanger, and arguably the greatest cliffhanger in the history of television.
Season 4 was the best overall season of Trek ever, to that point, and it may still be. Season 5 nearly matched it. Berman and Piller at Burbank. The last 2 seasons were a slip, but, if Q was right, and all good things must come to an end, it ended very well. (Or so we thought it was the end, until Picard.)
By a slim margin, TNG remains the best Star Trek series to date. But Discovery and Picard are currently ongoing, and may yet reach new heights of quality, boldly going where no Trek series has gone before.
No comments:
Post a Comment